Get in touch with QJKH Company
LiDAR for Overhead Crane
Compare YB industrial 2D LiDAR for non-safety detection and switching-output automation with SH27 safety laser scanners for safety-related protective sensing. Selection depends on the function the sensor must perform, required detection distance, control architecture and applicable machine-safety requirements.
Where LiDAR & Safety Laser Scanning Fit in Overhead Crane Applications
Laser scanning can support several different functions around an overhead crane, from simple distance and obstacle awareness to safety-related protective sensing. The important engineering question is therefore not simply “Can LiDAR detect the object?” but “What function must the detection perform?”
Distance Monitoring
Measure relative distance to another crane, runway structure, wall or other object so the control system can monitor approach conditions.
Object & Area Detection
Detect objects within a configured scan area and provide information that can be used for warning, sequencing or other automation logic.
Position & Approach Awareness
Use scan measurements to support positioning, docking, approach monitoring or host-side calculation where suitable for the application architecture.
Safety-Related Detection
Where detection is part of a required safety function, the sensing device and complete control architecture must satisfy the applicable safety requirements identified by the machine risk assessment.
Two Sensor Paths for Crane Applications
CCH offers both industrial 2D LiDAR and safety laser scanning. They may operate on similar laser-scanning principles, but they should not be treated as interchangeable devices.
YB Industrial 2D LiDAR
Suitable for applications such as distance, object and configurable-area sensing where the required function does not require a safety-rated protective device.
SH Safety Laser Scanner
Intended for applications where laser scanning forms part of a safety-related control function and the required design calls for Type 3 / PL d safety performance.
The sensor choice is determined by the required function, not simply by the fact that the equipment is an overhead crane. The same physical detection task may require a different sensing architecture depending on applicable standards, local requirements, machine risk assessment and the required safety performance.
Typical Overhead Crane Detection & Anti-Collision Applications
Bridge cranes, gantry cranes and other travelling crane systems may require awareness of nearby cranes, runway limits, fixed structures or objects within shared operating areas. Laser scanning can provide configurable detection zones and switching signals that the crane control system uses for warning, reduced-speed operation, motion inhibition or other defined responses.
Crane-to-Crane Approach Monitoring
When two travelling cranes operate on the same runway or within overlapping working areas, a scanner can monitor the approach of another crane or defined structure before the distance becomes critical.
End-of-Runway & Structure Detection
Laser scanning can monitor the crane travelling direction for runway-end structures, walls, columns or other fixed objects entering configured detection areas as the crane approaches.
Obstacle & Shared-Zone Monitoring
In facilities where cranes, machinery or structures share operating space, 2D scanning can detect objects entering a defined scan plane or monitored area and provide switching information to the control system.
Multi-Zone Approach Control
Configurable detection zones can support staged crane approach logic, allowing different switching outputs to be associated with progressively closer monitored areas.
Detection Is Only One Part of the Anti-Collision Function
The scanner detects whether an object has entered a configured area. The resulting switching signal is then evaluated by the crane control system. The required control architecture depends on whether the function is ordinary automation or a safety-related function.
The LiDAR or safety laser scanner monitors the configured detection or protective area.
Detection produces the applicable switching output or safety-rated OSSD state.
The control system applies the configured response such as warning, reduced speed, motion inhibition or stopping.
The complete function is verified against the application, stopping behaviour and applicable safety requirements.
“Anti-collision” describes the application objective, not the safety classification of the sensing device. YB switching-output 2D LiDAR can be used for non-safety crane detection and automation logic. Where the detection function is safety-related, the required safety performance must be determined from the applicable standards, local requirements and machine risk assessment, with an appropriate safety-rated sensing and control architecture used where required.
Recommended CCH Sensors for Overhead Crane Applications
For typical overhead-crane approach and anti-collision applications, the primary requirement is often a switching signal that can be integrated into the crane control system. CCH provides two distinct routes: YB industrial 2D LiDAR for non-safety detection and SH27 S-series safety laser scanners when the required function needs safety-rated protective sensing.
YB Switching Output 2D LiDAR
For non-safety crane detection, configurable monitoring areas and PLC-based automation logic. Switching output can be configured as PNP or NPN.
Use YB switching-output models when the crane requires non-safety distance, object or configurable-area detection and the resulting PNP / NPN signal will be processed by a standard PLC or automation controller.
SH27 S-Series Safety Laser Scanner
For crane applications where the scanning function is part of a safety-related control system and the required design calls for Type 3 / PL d protective sensing.
Use the SH27 S-series when detection is required as part of a safety-related protective function. The protective field acts through the safety-rated OSSD output. The larger warning field is available for non-safety warning or preliminary control functions.
Start With the Required Control Function
Need raw scan data as well? Selected YB configurations provide raw scan data for host-side processing. SH27-03D and SH27-05D retain the SH27 safety functions and additionally provide non-safety Ethernet raw distance, angle and echo-intensity data. Raw scan data does not replace the safety-rated OSSD function.
How Multi-Zone Crane Anti-Collision Control Works
A single detection point is often not enough for a travelling crane. Multiple monitored zones can provide progressively earlier responses as the crane approaches another crane, runway structure or obstacle. The exact zone distances and control actions must be engineered for the actual crane speed, braking behaviour and required function.
Far Zone → Intermediate Zone → Near Zone
The following is a conceptual example rather than a fixed factory setting. Actual field geometry, distances and responses should be defined during machine design and commissioning.
Early Warning
The first monitored area detects an approaching crane or obstacle while sufficient separation still remains.
Reduced Speed
A closer monitored area can trigger a second control stage when the crane continues to approach the detected object.
Stop or Motion Inhibit
The closest zone can be associated with the final configured control response before the available separation becomes unacceptable.
YB Switching Output Control
YB switching-output LiDAR can monitor configured detection zones and provide PNP / NPN switching signals to a standard PLC or crane automation controller for non-safety industrial detection.
SH27 Safety Scanner Control
Where the sensing function is safety-related, SH27 provides a safety-rated protective field and PNP OSSD outputs for integration into the applicable safety control architecture.
Warning, Deceleration and Safety Stop Are Not Automatically the Same Function
With YB, switching outputs are intended for industrial automation and non-safety detection. A PLC may use those signals for configured warning, speed-reduction or stopping logic, but this does not make the sensing function safety-rated.
With SH27, the safety-related sensing function is provided through the protective field and safety-rated PNP OSSD outputs. SH warning fields can support preliminary warning or other non-safety switching functions, but the warning field itself must not be used as the safety-rated protective field.
Zone distances should never be selected from a generic template alone. Crane travel speed, sensor response time, controller and drive response, braking behaviour, load condition, installation geometry and the required safety performance all influence the final field design. These factors are addressed in the following engineering section.
How to Determine the Required Crane Detection Distance
The required scanning distance should be derived from the actual motion of the crane rather than selected from sensor range alone. Travel speed, sensor response, controller and drive response, braking behaviour, load condition and engineering margin all influence how early an approaching crane or obstacle needs to be detected.
Start From the Crane, Not From the Sensor Catalogue
First determine how much distance the moving crane needs to detect, process and respond to an obstacle. Then select a sensor capable of reliably covering that requirement under the actual installation conditions.
Crane Travel Speed
A faster travelling crane covers more distance during the same sensor and control-system response time. Maximum operating speed should therefore be considered when defining detection zones.
Sensor Response Time
Detection is not instantaneous. YB switching-output response time depends on scan-count configuration, while SH27 response time is configurable around the required safety-scanner operating mode.
Controller & Drive Response
PLC scan time, safety controller response, drive-command delay and other control-system behaviour add to the total time before the crane begins to decelerate or stop.
Mechanical Braking Distance
The crane continues moving after the stop command is issued. Brake condition, drive system, travel speed and mechanical characteristics influence the actual stopping distance.
Load & Operating Condition
A crane may not stop identically under every operating condition. Validation should consider relevant load, travel direction, operating mode and expected worst-case conditions.
Engineering Margin
Allow additional distance for measurement uncertainty, installation tolerance, environmental variation and other factors identified during system design and commissioning.
From Crane Motion to Sensor Model
A useful selection process works backwards from the required control response rather than beginning with the longest available LiDAR range.
Establish the operating condition used for the detection design.
Include sensor, controller, drive and related response delays.
Establish actual stopping performance under relevant conditions.
Set warning, speed-reduction and final intervention areas.
Confirm range, reflectivity, geometry and control architecture on the real crane.
YB Switching Output LiDAR
Available working range depends on the selected YB model. These distances describe industrial LiDAR detection capability under the stated target-reflectivity condition and should be validated using representative crane targets and installation geometry.
SH27 S-Series Safety Laser Scanner
SH27 protective range is specified at low target reflectivity for its safety-related protective function. SH27-03S provides a 3 m protective radius and SH27-05S provides a 5 m protective radius, with larger non-safety warning fields available by model.
Target Reflectivity Matters
Do not compare sensor range values without checking the stated reflectivity condition. A YB range such as 40 m @ 70% reflectivity and an SH protective range such as 5 m @ 1.8% reflectivity describe different performance conditions and different application purposes. Real crane structures may include painted steel, dark surfaces, reflective panels, openings and complex geometry, so representative target testing is recommended during commissioning.
A Generic Distance Formula Is Not a Safety Validation
When the scanner is part of a safety-related crane function, protective-field dimensions must be determined using the applicable regulations, standards, machine risk assessment and the validated response and stopping characteristics of the complete system. The simplified relationship shown above is useful for understanding the engineering factors, but it must not be treated as a universal safety-distance formula.
Installation Considerations for Overhead Crane LiDAR & Safety Scanners
Reliable crane detection depends on more than sensor range. Mounting position, scan-plane geometry, vibration, target reflectivity, contamination and the direction of crane travel all influence whether the configured detection zones work as intended. Final validation should always be performed on the actual crane and representative targets.
Mounting Position
Mount the scanner where it has a stable and unobstructed view of the intended approach path. Structural members, cable carriers, hoist components or other moving parts should not repeatedly enter the monitored plane unless they are intentionally included in the detection logic.
Scan-Plane Geometry
The 2D scan plane must intersect the part of the opposing crane, wall, runway structure or obstacle that should be detected. A long nominal sensor range is not useful if the scan plane passes above, below or through an open section of the target.
Travel Direction
A crane may require monitoring in one or both travelling directions. Sensor quantity and mounting position should be chosen so that the relevant approach direction remains covered throughout the required operating area.
Vibration & Mechanical Stability
Crane travel, acceleration and braking can introduce vibration. Use a rigid bracket and verify that the sensor does not shift or rotate enough to move the configured detection field away from the intended target area.
Dust, Dirt & Window Condition
Industrial crane environments may contain dust, oil mist or other contamination. Keep the optical window accessible for inspection and maintenance and establish a cleaning interval appropriate to the operating environment.
Reflectivity & Ambient Conditions
Painted steel, dark surfaces, reflective markings and changing background conditions can produce different return levels. Commission the system using representative targets and verify reliable operation under the expected lighting and environmental conditions.
Make the Scan Plane Intersect a Reliable Target
Overhead cranes contain beams, wheels, rail structures, gaps and moving components. The scanner should be positioned so the monitored plane consistently intersects a suitable target surface throughout the required approach path.
One Scanner May Be Sufficient
If the application only needs detection in one defined approach direction and the required scan plane remains unobstructed, a single scanner may cover the required monitoring task.
Two-Sided Coverage May Be Required
Where the crane can approach hazards or other cranes from both travel directions, separate sensing positions may be required. The final quantity should be determined from the actual mechanical layout and required coverage rather than assuming one scanner can always monitor both directions.
Validate the Installation Before Putting It Into Service
Configuration software can define detection fields, but real-world commissioning is required to confirm that the fields match the intended crane geometry and control behaviour.
Verify mounting position, angle and scan-plane height.
Use the actual crane structure or equivalent target surfaces.
Confirm switching behaviour at the intended field boundaries.
Verify warning, speed reduction and stopping behaviour as used.
Check relevant travel speeds, load conditions and environment.
Installation quality is part of sensing performance. A correctly selected LiDAR or safety laser scanner can still produce unreliable results if its scan plane misses the intended target, the bracket moves under vibration or contamination is allowed to accumulate on the optical window. Mechanical installation, configuration and functional validation should therefore be treated as one engineering process.
When Does an Overhead Crane Need Safety-Rated Scanning?
There is no single global rule stating that every overhead crane anti-collision application must use the same sensor classification. The required sensing architecture depends on the safety function, machine risk assessment, applicable legislation, crane-specific standards, control-system requirements and local project specifications.
Determine the Required Safety Function First
A sensor should not be selected as “safety” or “non-safety” simply because it is installed on a crane. First establish what the detection function must achieve and what risk reduction the complete control system is required to provide.
Identify collision hazards, operating conditions and possible consequences.
Determine whether detection is ordinary automation or part of required safety-related risk reduction.
Select sensing and control components suitable for the required performance and validate the complete function.
Machinery & Crane Safety Requirements Are Risk-Based
For EU projects, the applicable machinery legislation should be considered together with crane-specific and functional-safety standards. The required Performance Level or scanner architecture should be derived from the application rather than assumed solely from the fact that the machine is an overhead crane.
Remains applicable until 19 January 2027 and requires machinery manufacturers to carry out risk assessment and apply the relevant essential health and safety requirements.
Replaces Directive 2006/42/EC and continues the EU machinery framework with risk assessment and risk-reduction requirements.
Crane Requirements Meet Machine-Safety Requirements
In Brazil, NR-11 addresses transport, movement and handling of materials, including lifting equipment, while NR-12 establishes a broader framework for machinery safeguards and safety-related control systems.
A Brazilian government proposal for revision of NR-11 has included safety approach sensing concepts for bridge cranes, gantry cranes and semi-gantry cranes operating on the same rail. This is a proposed revision and must not be treated as currently effective NR-11 text. Always verify the current published requirements for the actual project.
Do Not Assume One Global Requirement
Requirements can differ by country, crane type, industry, customer specification and the role assigned to the collision detection function.
How Safety Requirements Affect YB vs SH Selection
The same physical crane application can use different sensing architectures depending on whether the scanner is performing a standard automation function or a required safety-related protective function.
YB Switching Output 2D LiDAR
Consider YB where the scanner provides configurable-zone, object or distance detection for standard crane automation and the project does not require the sensor itself to perform a safety-rated protective function.
SH27 Type 3 / PL d Safety Laser Scanner
Consider SH27 where laser scanning forms part of a safety-related protective function and the applicable risk assessment and control-system design require performance compatible with Type 3 / PL d protective sensing.
A Type 3 / PL d Scanner Does Not Automatically Make the Crane System PL d
SH27 provides safety-rated sensing and OSSD outputs, but the performance of the complete crane safety function also depends on the safety controller or relay, drive or contactor architecture, diagnostics, wiring, response time, braking behaviour, fault handling and final validation. Sensor classification is therefore one element of the complete safety-related control system.
Regulatory note: This section provides general engineering guidance and is not a legal compliance determination for a specific crane. Regulations and standards can change, and requirements vary by jurisdiction, machine design and intended use. Confirm the current applicable legislation, standards and project requirements with the responsible machine designer, safety engineer, end user or local conformity professional before final system design.
Overhead Crane LiDAR & Anti-Collision FAQ
The following questions cover the most common issues when selecting industrial LiDAR or safety laser scanning for bridge cranes, gantry cranes and other travelling crane systems.
What type of LiDAR is suitable for overhead crane anti-collision?
For many non-safety crane detection applications, a 2D LiDAR with configurable detection zones and switching outputs is suitable because the crane PLC normally needs a discrete signal when an object enters a defined area.
CCH YB switching-output models provide configurable PNP / NPN outputs for this type of industrial detection.
Can YB 2D LiDAR be used for crane collision avoidance?
Yes, YB switching-output models can be used for non-safety collision-avoidance, approach monitoring and configurable-zone detection where a standard industrial sensing function is appropriate.
YB is not a safety-rated protective device. If the detection function is required to provide safety-related risk reduction, the applicable safety architecture must be determined separately.
When should an overhead crane use a safety laser scanner instead?
A safety laser scanner should be considered when the scanning function is part of a safety-related control function and the machine risk assessment, applicable standards or project requirements call for safety-rated protective sensing.
SH27 provides Type 3 / SIL 2 / Category 3 / PL d sensing with safety-rated OSSD outputs.
Which SH27 models are suitable for switching-output crane applications?
The primary models for this application are SH27-03S and SH27-05S.
SH27-03S provides a 3 m protective radius at 1.8% reflectivity and a 10 m warning radius. SH27-05S provides a 5 m protective radius at 1.8% reflectivity and a 20 m warning radius.
Both use PNP safety-rated OSSD outputs for the protective function.
How far should an overhead crane anti-collision sensor detect?
There is no universal distance. The required distance should be determined from crane travel speed, sensing and control response time, drive response, braking distance, operating condition and engineering margin.
Sensor working range should then be selected and validated against that requirement using representative targets and the actual installation geometry.
Can one LiDAR provide warning, slow-down and stop zones?
Configurable monitored zones can support staged control logic. For example, a farther area may trigger warning, an intermediate area may initiate speed reduction, and a closer area may be associated with stop or motion inhibition.
The exact behaviour depends on the selected sensor and control architecture. With YB these are non-safety industrial switching functions. With SH27, only the protective field and safety-rated OSSD should be relied upon for the defined safety-related protective function.
Can the SH safety scanner warning field be used as the safety stop field?
No. The SH warning field is intended for preliminary non-safety functions such as warning or other simple switching actions.
The safety-related function is based on the configured protective field and OSSD safety output.
Does Brazil NR-12 require every overhead crane to use a Type 3 safety scanner?
NR-12 should not be interpreted as a universal statement that every overhead crane must use one particular scanner model or classification.
The appropriate protective measures and safety-system performance depend on the machine risk assessment, required safety function and applicable standards. NR-11 should also be considered for crane and material-handling requirements.
What is the difference between NR-11 and NR-12 for overhead cranes?
In Brazil, NR-11 addresses transport, movement, storage and handling of materials, including lifting equipment. NR-12 provides the broader machinery-safety framework, including safeguarding and safety-related control measures.
A crane project may therefore need to consider both, together with the applicable technical standards and project-specific risk assessment.
Can one scanner monitor both directions of crane travel?
Sometimes, but it should not be assumed. A 2D scanner only monitors its actual scan plane and field of view.
If hazards or other cranes can be approached from opposite ends, two mounting positions or two scanners may be required to achieve reliable coverage. The mechanical layout should determine the final sensor quantity.
What output should be used for overhead crane PLC integration?
For the typical detection applications covered on this page, switching outputs are the primary interface.
YB switching models provide configurable PNP / NPN outputs for standard PLC integration. SH27 S-series uses PNP OSSD outputs for its safety-related protective function.
Do overhead crane applications need raw LiDAR data?
Usually not for a conventional multi-zone anti-collision application because the PLC typically only needs switching information.
If the host system also needs individual scan measurements for custom software processing, selected YB models provide raw scan data. SH27-03D and SH27-05D add Ethernet raw distance, angle and echo-intensity data while retaining the SH safety functions.
YB or SH27?
Choose for non-safety configurable-zone detection using PNP / NPN outputs to a standard PLC.
Choose where the required design calls for Type 3 / PL d protective sensing and safety-rated OSSD outputs.
Need Help Selecting YB or SH27 for Your Crane?
Tell us how the crane moves, the required detection distance, the expected control response and whether the function is safety-related. We can help narrow the appropriate switching-output model and sensing architecture.
Final sensor selection should be based on the complete crane application. Detection range alone does not determine suitability. Output type, target reflectivity, scan geometry, response and braking behaviour, environmental conditions, local requirements and the role of the sensing function should all be considered before commissioning.
Technical & Regulatory References
The following sources provide background for the crane-safety, risk-assessment, safety-control and protective-scanner principles discussed on this page. Applicable editions and legal requirements should always be verified for the specific project and destination market.
Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC
Current EU machinery framework applicable before the general application date of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230. It establishes essential health and safety requirements and a risk-based machinery-safety approach.
EUR-Lex · European Union ↗Regulation (EU) 2023/1230
The new EU Machinery Regulation replaces Directive 2006/42/EC and continues the machinery framework for risk assessment, essential requirements and conformity assessment.
EUR-Lex · European Union ↗EN 15011:2020
Cranes — Bridge and gantry cranes. A crane-specific European standard covering significant hazards and safety requirements for bridge and gantry crane machinery within its scope.
BSI · Standards Information ↗Do Not Treat the Machinery Regulation as Fully Replacing the Directive Yet
As of 2026, Directive 2006/42/EC remains the principal current EU machinery framework until 19 January 2027. Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 generally applies from 20 January 2027, although certain individual provisions have earlier application dates.
ISO 12100:2010
Safety of machinery — General principles for design — Risk assessment and risk reduction. Provides the fundamental methodology for identifying hazards, estimating and evaluating risk and applying risk-reduction measures.
International Organization for Standardization ↗ISO 13849-1:2023
Provides methodology and requirements for the design and integration of safety-related parts of control systems. It does not itself specify the safety function or PLr required for a particular crane application.
International Organization for Standardization ↗IEC 61496-3:2025
Particular requirements for active opto-electronic protective devices responsive to diffuse reflection (AOPDDR), covering the protective-device technology associated with safety laser scanning.
International Electrotechnical Commission ↗NR-11
Brazilian regulatory standard addressing transport, movement, storage and handling of materials, including requirements relevant to lifting and material-handling operations.
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ↗NR-12
Brazilian machinery-safety regulation defining fundamental principles, technical references and protective requirements for machines and equipment. The current official page identifies its latest modification as March 2024.
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ↗Proposed Revision of NR-11
Published consultation text for revision of NR-11. The proposal includes specific approach-sensing provisions for certain bridge, gantry and semi-gantry cranes travelling on the same rail.
Participa + Brasil · Federal Government ↗Keep the NR-11 Revision Separate From the Current Regulation
The public-consultation proposal includes safety approach sensors monitored by a safety interface for bridge cranes, gantry cranes and semi-gantry cranes moving on the same rail, with the proposed objective of achieving a safe stop and avoiding impacts. This proposed wording must not be represented as an already effective NR-11 requirement.
View NR-11 Public Consultation →Standards Help Determine the Required Function — They Do Not Turn Every Crane Into the Same Application
References such as ISO 12100, EN 15011 and applicable regional legislation help identify hazards and establish required risk-reduction measures. ISO 13849-1 provides a methodology for safety-related control systems, while IEC 61496-3 addresses the protective-device technology. The required PLr, field dimensions and final sensing architecture must still be determined for the specific machine and safety function.
Reference note: Standards and regulations are revised over time. Always verify the currently applicable published edition, national adoption, harmonized-standard status and project-specific requirements before final machine design or conformity assessment. Product certification claims should be checked against the actual documentation for the specific CCH model rather than inferred from the latest edition of a referenced standard.
